Canon PowerShot G16 versus Nikon Coolpix P7800

Canon PowerShot G16 vs Nikon Coolpix P7800

Canon PowerShot G16 vs Nikon Coolpix P7800

Canon PowerShot G16 vs Nikon Coolpix P7800

Often billed as the ideal friend for a DSLR when the too big, hefty or undesirable, the premium compact digicam sector in the market is one which seems to continue doing well in a otherwise heading downward market.

Premium compacts such as the Canon PowerShot G16 and Nikon Coolpix P7800 appeal to fan photographers simply because they allow full manual handle and blast in natural format.

Canon’s Grams series is certainly considered your gold standard involving premium compacts. The most recent model, your G16, features a Twelve.1 million-pixel sensing unit and built-in Wi-Fi. It goes sq on eyeball to eyeball with the Nikon P7800, which also features a 12.1 million pixel warning, but carries with it an integrated electric viewfinder.

Here we examine the two to see which is the better investment.

Canon G16 vs Nikon P7800: Dealing with

The G16 is easy to work with, with choices arranged quite sensibly with a number of direct access dials and also buttons. In addition to the camera, you will find two knobs, one pertaining to switching processes and another with regard to adjusting coverage compensation. A new dial for the front in the camera is used to adjust aperture or perhaps shutter speed (with respect to the shooting mode).

Meanwhile, the P7800 is an additional nicely built camera, having a pleasing variety of dials as well as buttons. Right here you’ll also find the exposure payment dial, with a handy light which indicates in the event it has been moved away from 2. There are also 2 handy customisable operate buttons and also a quick food selection button regarding accessing employed settings.

Winner: Draw

Canon G16 as opposed to Nikon P7800: Image Quality

Our medical tests indicate that this Canon makes better uncooked format files than the Nikon, which can be useful if you’d prefer to work with your own images in post-production. We’ve found that real world photos display a great amount of colour along with detail. Minimal light efficiency is also exceptional, as is the ability to shoot from 9fps. The Canon’s contact, offering a new maximum aperture regarding f/1.8-2.8 furthermore beats the Nikon’s.

Image quality can be very good from the P7800, with our labradors tests indicating that JPEG images are marginally better (for dynamic range and transmission to noise ratio) compared to the Canon ? great if you don’t desire the hassle of post production. Although lens includes a longer glide range (Several.1x compared to 5x), it won’t have the maximum wide aperture of the G16. This might create a more appealing task to travelling photographers.

Winner: Rule G16

Canon G16 vs Nikon P7800: window screens and viewfinders

The G16 maintains the same set screen because the G15. It’s a good singer, viewable from your decent range of angles. It would be nice to view a touch screen, especially as its sibling canon’s PowerShot S120 has an exceptional one. The actual direct viewfinder is basically a hole inside top of the photographic camera, so there’s no information (such as aperture) to work with. Prior generations with the G collection had a great articulating screen, but Canon have decided which a fixed screen is a better all round choice, and it really does keep the size down.

Nikon will be giving equally barrels in the EVF and screen war, having a fully articulating display screen, useful for crafting from uncomfortable angles as well as self-portraits. The display is also an RGBW device, with the W meaning white, addressing the extra bright pixels which give it increased lighting and comparison. Meanwhile, Nikon scrapped it’s optical viewfinder within the last generation from the P array, but it has reintroduced a finder – an electronic one. It can be only little, but it has 921,000 dots and is beneficial. There’s no warning for evaluating when it has become lifted to your eye, nonetheless, which is a waste.

Winner: Nikon P7800

Canon G16 vs Nikon P7800: extras

The G16′s built in Wi-Fi can be used to transfer images around to a smart phone or tablet, or distribute directly to solutions such as Facebook or myspace, making it great for social sharers. Sadly, the no cost app (readily available for iOS and Android mobile phone), doesn’t provde the ability to management the camera from another location, which seems a shame. The particular G16 also has many scene modes and digital camera filters and also the fun "Hybrid Auto" mode that creates a brief video compiled of videos shot just before each photograph taken each day. The new celebrity mode makes it possible for the easy and automatic capture of star trails, star time expire and legend nightscape.

Sadly there’s no built-in Wi-Fi on the P7800, together with Nikon still making it mandatory consumers acquire an extra Wi-Fi and also GPS component. There are some scene modes however, and a few computer graphics to choose from. If you wish to create a wide ranging image, you’ll find this hidden away in one of the scene options, however at least it really is available, unlike on the G16. Each the cameras have a hotshoe, which means you can add external equipment, such as flashguns.

Winner: Cannon G16

Canon G16 vs Nikon P7800: Price

At £489/$489, your G16 is a substantial investment, pricing more than a good entry-level DSLR. However, you do obtain maximum freedom, full handbook control, organic shooting as well as a pocketable device, making this a great second digital camera. It’s a touch more expensive as opposed to P7800 in the UK, and if you’re on a tight budget, possibly look to the particular Nikon.

In the US, these kinds of cameras are the same price. Both offer a great deal for your money, despite the high price tag. Bear in mind although, that you will have to cover extra for the Wi-Fi module for that Nikon P7800 if you need the idea.

It’s also well worth noting that both of these digital cameras are significantly cheaper than your Sony RX100 Two, which is enormous competition in this segment of the market.

Winner: Draw

Verdict

It’s a hardcore call deciding on between those two cameras. Finally it may come down to brand preference or the amount you need Wi-Fi or an articulated screen. All round, we think the G16 offers more good value, with a far better lens as well as a more pocketable body size. That said, the The new sony RX100 II is additionally definitely merit a look, mainly because it has a larger sensor yet a comparable bodily proportions.

Don’t forget to look into the full Cannon PowerShot G16 review along with Nikon Coolpix P7800 review for more in-depth analysis as well as plenty of taste images and labs data.

Winner: Canon G16